Utility Reform Project v. Energy Fac. Siting Council

Full title: UTILITY REFORM PROJECT, Petitioner, v. ENERGY FACILITY SITING COUNCIL…

Court: Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 23, 1996

905 P.2d 1154 (Or. 1996)

905 P.2d 1154

Opinion

SC S41778 (Control), SC S41779 (Cases Consolidated)

Argued and submitted March 9, 1995

Affirmed by an equally divided court November 24, 1995, Reconsideration denied January 23, 1996

On judicial review from the Final Order of the Energy Facility Siting Council dated September 16, 1994.

Daniel W. Meek, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners Don't Waste Oregon Council and Colleen O'Neil. With him on the brief was Linda K. Williams, Portland.

Linda K. Williams, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner Utility Reform Project. With her on the brief was Daniel W. Meek, Portland.

John T. Bagg, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents Energy Facility Siting Council and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. With him on the response were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

J. Jeffrey Dudley, Portland, argued the cause and filed the response for respondent Portland General Electric Company.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis, and Durham, Justices.^_

_ Graber, J., did not participate in this decision.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Affirmed by an equally divided court.