From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Young

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Bluefield
Apr 29, 2010
CRIMINAL NO. 1:88-00112-01 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 29, 2010)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 1:88-00112-01.

April 29, 2010


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Pending before the court is defendant's motion for reduction in sentence, filed on October 2, 2009. (Doc. # 338). For the reasons expressed in the court's Memorandum Opinion of April 21, 2006, and Magistrate Judge VanDervort's Proposed Findings and Recommendation of November 4, 2005, both entered in Civil Action No. 1:04-1282, the motion is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to defendant, counsel of record, the United States Attorney, and the United States Probation Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

U.S. v. Young

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Bluefield
Apr 29, 2010
CRIMINAL NO. 1:88-00112-01 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 29, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Young

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG

Court:United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Bluefield

Date published: Apr 29, 2010

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 1:88-00112-01 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 29, 2010)

Citing Cases

Young v. Stansberry

In his § 2241 petition, Young sought a reduction in sentence based on Amendment 657 to the United States…

U.S. v. Young

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by…