From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wright

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 2, 2005
No. CR-96-0366 MMC (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2005)

Opinion

No. CR-96-0366 MMC.

May 2, 2005


ORDER RE: DEFENDANT'S LETTER OF APRIL 24, 2005.


The Court is in receipt of a letter from defendant, dated April 24, 2005, in which defendant states he is currently serving his federal sentence in the Waupun Correctional Institution in Waupun, Wisconsin and requests that he be transferred to another institution.

The Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") "may direct confinement in any available facility and may transfer a prisoner from one facility to another at any time." See Prows v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 981 F. 2d 466, 469 n. 3 (10th Cir. 1992). The sentencing judge does not have the authority to order that the BOP place a federal prisoner in a particular place of confinement. See United States v. Serafini, 233 F. 3d 758, 778 n. 23 (3rd Cir. 2000) (holding "a district court has no power to dictate or impose any place of confinement for the imprisonment portion of the sentence").

According, defendant's request for an order that he be transferred to a different institution is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Wright

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 2, 2005
No. CR-96-0366 MMC (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2005)
Case details for

United States v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. JOHN EARL WRIGHT, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: May 2, 2005

Citations

No. CR-96-0366 MMC (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2005)