Opinion
NO. 2:11-CR-33.
June 24, 2011
ORDER
This criminal matter is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated June 2, 2011. [Doc. 13]. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of his residence on March 31, 2011, be denied.
The defendant has filed an objection to this report asserting various legal conclusions without any supporting authority. [Doc. 21].
After careful de novo consideration of the Report and Recommendation and supplemental Reports and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, the defendant's objection to the Report and Recommendation, the defendant's motion to suppress, the response of the government, and for the reasons set out in the Report and Recommendation which are incorporated by reference herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED, and that the defendant's motion to suppress is DENIED. [Doc. 8].
The defendant's request for oral argument in his objection is likewise DENIED.