From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. White

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 17, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07-cr-00271 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 17, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:07-cr-00271.

September 17, 2007


REPORT RECOMMENDATION


Pursuant to General Order 99-49, this matter has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Nancy A. Vecchiarelli for purposes of receiving, on consent of the parties, the defendant's offer of a plea of guilty, conducting the colloquy prescribed by Fed.R.Crim.P. 11, causing a verbatim record of the proceedings to be prepared, referring the matter, if appropriate, for presentence investigation, and submitting a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation stating whether the plea should be accepted and a finding of guilty entered. The following, along with the transcript or other record of the proceedings submitted herewith, constitutes the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation concerning the plea of guilty proffered by the defendant.

1. On September 13, 2007, the defendant, accompanied by counsel, proffered a plea of guilty to counts 1, 2, and 9 of the indictment. The Government agrees to move the Court to dismiss count 20 of the indictment at the time of sentencing.
2. Prior to such proffer, the defendant was examined as to his competency, advised of the charge and consequences of conviction, informed that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines are advisory and the Court must consider them but the Court may impose any reasonable sentence authorized by law, notified of his rights, advised that he was waiving all his rights except the right to counsel and otherwise was provided with the information prescribed in Fed.R.Crim.P. 11.
3. The parties and counsel informed the court about the plea agreement between the parties; the undersigned was advised that, aside from such agreement as described or submitted to the court, no other commitments or promises have been made by any party, and no other agreements, written or unwritten, have been made between the parties.
4. The undersigned questioned the defendant under oath about the knowing, intelligent, and voluntary nature of the plea of guilty, and finds that the defendant was competent to enter a plea and the plea was offered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily.
5. The parties provided the undersigned with sufficient information about the charged offense(s) and the defendant's conduct to establish a factual basis for the plea.

In light of the foregoing and the record submitted herewith, the undersigned finds that the defendant's plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, and all requirements imposed by the United States Constitution and Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 have been satisfied. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that the plea of guilty be accepted and a finding of guilty be entered by the Court. The parties disagree on the amount of loss or attempted loss for the checks directly associated to the defendant and agree to the Court making that determination at the time of sentencing.

NOTICE

Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Courts within ten (10) days of this notice. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. see, United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). See, also, Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985), reh'g denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986).


Summaries of

U.S. v. White

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 17, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07-cr-00271 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 17, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. White

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS L. WHITE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Sep 17, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 1:07-cr-00271 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 17, 2007)