From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. White

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
May 11, 2010
Case No. 3:04-cr-052, Also Case No. 3:10-cv-073 (S.D. Ohio May. 11, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 3:04-cr-052, Also Case No. 3:10-cv-073.

May 11, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. No. 91), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto, despite an extension of time to do so, and that the time for filing such objections as extended under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired on April 30, 2010, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Vacate (Doc. No. 89) be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Defendant is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis and any requested certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

U.S. v. White

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
May 11, 2010
Case No. 3:04-cr-052, Also Case No. 3:10-cv-073 (S.D. Ohio May. 11, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. White

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RANDY WHITE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: May 11, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:04-cr-052, Also Case No. 3:10-cv-073 (S.D. Ohio May. 11, 2010)