From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Werlein

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 14, 2010
Criminal No. 10-59(1) (DWF/FLN) (D. Minn. Jul. 14, 2010)

Opinion

Criminal No. 10-59(1) (DWF/FLN).

July 14, 2010

LeeAnn K. Bell, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, cousnel for Plaintiff.

Andrea K. George, Assistant Federal Defender, Office of the Federal Defender, counsel for Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated June 24, 2010, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of search and seizure (Doc. No. [14]) is DENIED;

2. Defendant's motion to suppress statements, admissions and answers (Doc. No. [15]) is DENIED as moot;

3. Defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of search and seizure (Doc. No. [31]) is DENIED; and

4. Defendant's motion to suppress statements, admissions and answers (Doc. No. [32]) is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Werlein

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 14, 2010
Criminal No. 10-59(1) (DWF/FLN) (D. Minn. Jul. 14, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Werlein

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Shane Allen Werlein, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jul 14, 2010

Citations

Criminal No. 10-59(1) (DWF/FLN) (D. Minn. Jul. 14, 2010)