From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Watson

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 6, 2010
CRIMINAL ACTION, NO. 07-cr-238 (E.D. Pa. May. 6, 2010)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION, NO. 07-cr-238.

May 6, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 6th day of May 2010, upon consideration of Defendant Roderick Watson's Addendum to the Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence (Doc. No. 60), the Government's Response in Opposition to the Addendum (Doc. No. 61), the Government's Supplemental Opposition to the Addendum (Doc. No. 88), Defendant Roderick Watson's Motion to Sever (Doc. No. 55), the Government's Omnibus Response to Defendant's Pre-Trial Motions (Doc. No. 58), the hearing held on April 14, 2010, and for the reasons stated in the Opinion dated May 6, 2010, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendant Roderick Watson's Addendum to the Motion to Suppress (Doc. No. 61) is DENIED.
2. Defendant Roderick Watson's Motion to Sever (Doc. No. 55) is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Watson

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 6, 2010
CRIMINAL ACTION, NO. 07-cr-238 (E.D. Pa. May. 6, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Watson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RODERICK WATSON

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 6, 2010

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION, NO. 07-cr-238 (E.D. Pa. May. 6, 2010)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Noyes

United States v. Hudgins, 338 Fed. Appx. 150, 152 (3d Cir. July 27, 2009) ( quoting United States v. Gorecki,…

United States v. Stevens

Torres , however, does not deal with a "same or similar character" analysis but a "common scheme or plan"…