From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Vyhnalek

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Nov 4, 2005
4:04CR3099 (D. Neb. Nov. 4, 2005)

Opinion

4:04CR3099.

November 4, 2005


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Because it appears that Robert V. Vyhnalek, Rose Vyhnalek, and Richard Crawford are represented by the same attorney, and a conflict of interest could exist as a result,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The court advises each of the defendants that they have a right to independent counsel. If such a defendant cannot afford counsel, independent counsel will be appointed at no cost to the defendant.
2. At the time of sentencing, and before I decide whether to accept the plea agreements, I will conduct a hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 44 to determine whether the defendants should be permitted to proceed with the same lawyer.
3. Prior to the time of sentencing, defense counsel shall meet in person and separately with each defendant. At that meeting, defense counsel shall advise each client of the provisions of this order, the defendant's right to independent counsel and the appointment of counsel by the court at no cost to the defendant, and the risks of joint representation. At the time of sentencing, and for each defendant, counsel shall affirmatively state on the record that he has complied with this directive.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Vyhnalek

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Nov 4, 2005
4:04CR3099 (D. Neb. Nov. 4, 2005)
Case details for

U.S. v. Vyhnalek

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT VYHNALEK, ROSE VYHNALEK…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Nov 4, 2005

Citations

4:04CR3099 (D. Neb. Nov. 4, 2005)