From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Ventura

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jul 24, 2007
Case No. 4:06CR3167 (D. Neb. Jul. 24, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 4:06CR3167.

July 24, 2007


TENTATIVE FINDINGS


I am in receipt of the presentence investigation report in this case. There are no objections or motions for departure or variance.

IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) The undersigned will consult and follow the Guidelines to the extent permitted and required by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005) and subsequent cases. See, e.g., Rita v. United States, ___ S.Ct. ___, 2007 WL 1772146 (2007). In this regard, the undersigned gives notice that, unless otherwise ordered, he will (a) give the advisory Guidelines substantial weight; (b) resolve all factual disputes relevant to sentencing by the greater weight of the evidence and without the aid of a jury; (c) impose upon the government the burden of proof on all Guideline-enhancements; (d) impose upon the defendant the burden of proof on all Guideline-mitigators; (e) depart from the advisory Guidelines, if appropriate, using pre-Booker departure theory; and (f) in cases where a departure using pre-Booker departure theory is not warranted, deviate or vary from the Guidelines when there is a plainly superior, principled reason which justifies a sentence different than that called for by application of the advisory Guidelines.

This does not mean that I will apply a "presumption." That is a choice for appellate courts to make. As I have done in the past, I will filter the Guidelines' general advice through § 3553(a)'s list of factors.

See note 1.

(2) There are no disputed matters regarding the presentence report and the proper computation of the advisory Guidelines ranges.

(3) Except to the extent (if at all) that I have sustained an objection or granted a motion or reserved an issue for later resolution in the preceding paragraph, the parties are herewith notified that my tentative findings are that the presentence report is correct in all respects.

(4) If any party wishes to challenge these tentative findings, said party shall, as soon as possible, but in any event at least five (5) business days before sentencing, file in the court file and serve upon opposing counsel and the court a motion challenging these tentative findings, supported by (a) such evidentiary materials as are required (giving due regard to the requirements of the local rules of practice respecting the submission of evidentiary materials), (b) a brief as to the law and (c) if an evidentiary hearing is requested, a statement describing why an evidentiary hearing is necessary and how long such a hearing would take.

(5) Absent submission of the information required by the preceding paragraph of this order, my tentative findings may become final and the presentence report may be adopted and relied upon by me without more.

(6) Unless otherwise ordered, any motion challenging these tentative findings shall be resolved at sentencing.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Ventura

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jul 24, 2007
Case No. 4:06CR3167 (D. Neb. Jul. 24, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Ventura

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ISAIAS VENTURA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Jul 24, 2007

Citations

Case No. 4:06CR3167 (D. Neb. Jul. 24, 2007)