From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Taylor

United States District Court, D. Utah
May 19, 2004
Case No. 2:03-CR-900 DAK (D. Utah May. 19, 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 2:03-CR-900 DAK

May 19, 2004

STEPHEN R. McCAUGHEY, Salt Lake City, Utah, for Defendant


FINDINGS AND ORDER


Based on motion of the defendant and stipulation of the plaintiff, the court enters the following;

FINDINGS

1. If defendant's motion to continue were denied it would deny the defendant continuity of counsel.

2. Counsel needs additional time to effectively prepare for trial and consult with the defendant.

3. Counsel has exercised due diligence in preparing this case.

4. The ends of justice in granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the trial date of Monday, May 24, 2004, be stricken and the trial continued to the 6th day of July, 2004, at 8:30 a.m.

It is further, ORDERED that the time between May 24, 2004, and the next trial date be excluded from the computation for the time for trial as described in 18 U.S.C. § 3161.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Taylor

United States District Court, D. Utah
May 19, 2004
Case No. 2:03-CR-900 DAK (D. Utah May. 19, 2004)
Case details for

U.S. v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, V. SHANE ALAN TAYLOR, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Utah

Date published: May 19, 2004

Citations

Case No. 2:03-CR-900 DAK (D. Utah May. 19, 2004)