From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Stewart

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 3, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07CR289 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 3, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:07CR289.

August 3, 2007


ORDER


Defendant, through counsel, filed a "Motion to Appoint Investigator," (ECF Doc. No 33). Defendants' motion requests the Court appoint an investigator at the expense of the Government and permit counsel to select the investigator, to wit: Thomas Pavlish of Empire Investigations.

The Government replies that before an investigator is properly appointed at the expense of the public, the defendant should be required to describe the services to be provided and to make some showing why these services are necessary for the preparation of a proper defense (ECF Doc. No. 38).

The Government has no objection to defense counsel's motiont if such information will only be disclosed to the Court in camera.

The Court grants, in part, Defendant's motion. Defendant will file a brief explaining why the appointment of an investigator is necessary; describe the services that will be provided by the investigator; and show why these services are necessary to a proper preparation of the defense. Defendant will file its brief by August 9, 2007 and the Government will reply by August 16, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Stewart

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 3, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07CR289 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 3, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES STEWART, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 3, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 1:07CR289 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 3, 2007)