U.S. v. Solis-Arzaga

Full title: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Adrian Alejandro…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Aug 8, 2007

235 F. App'x 288 (5th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-50037, Conference Calendar.

August 8, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Federal Public Defender's Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 3:06-CR-1025-2.

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:[fn*] [fn*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Adrian Alejandro Solis-Arzaga raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000), which held that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), did not render 21 U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.