From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Soergel

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jun 20, 2008
8:08CR120 (D. Neb. Jun. 20, 2008)

Opinion

8:08CR120.

June 20, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the defendant's second motion to continue trial [22]. In the interest of justice, the court will grant a final continuance to July 8, 2008.

IT IS ORDERED that defendant's motion [22] is granted, in part, as follows:

1. The trial of this matter is continued to July 8, 2008. At that time, the parties will be expected to be prepared either to try the case or to enter a change of plea on the record.

2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between June 10, 2008 and July 8, 2008, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act because counsel require additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B)(iv).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Soergel

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jun 20, 2008
8:08CR120 (D. Neb. Jun. 20, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Soergel

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RONNIE F. SOERGEL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Jun 20, 2008

Citations

8:08CR120 (D. Neb. Jun. 20, 2008)