From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Soberano

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Mar 15, 2007
8:06CR280 (D. Neb. Mar. 15, 2007)

Opinion

8:06CR280.

March 15, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Arturo Soberano (Soberano) (Filing No. 33). Soberano seeks a ninety-day continuance of the trial of this matter which is scheduled for March 19, 2007. Soberano's counsel represents that counsel for the government has no objection to the motion. Soberano's counsel represents that Soberano consents to the motion and acknowledges he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted in part.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Soberano's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 33) is granted in part as set forth below.

2. Trial of this matter is re-scheduled for April 30, 2007, before Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between March 15, 2007 and April 30, 2007, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason that defendants' counsel require additional time to adequately prepare the case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Soberano

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Mar 15, 2007
8:06CR280 (D. Neb. Mar. 15, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Soberano

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARTURO SOBERANO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Mar 15, 2007

Citations

8:06CR280 (D. Neb. Mar. 15, 2007)