From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Snake

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
May 9, 2008
8:08CR94 (D. Neb. May. 9, 2008)

Opinion

8:08CR94.

May 9, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the motion for an extension of time by defendant Edward Anthony Snake (Snake) (Filing No. 20). Snake seeks an additional twenty-one days in which to file pretrial motions in accordance with the progression order. Snake's counsel represents that Snake will file an affidavit wherein he consents to the motion and acknowledges he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. Snake's counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted.

IT IS ORDERED:

Defendant Snake's motion for an extension of time (Filing No. 20) is granted. Snake is given until on or before June 2, 2008, in which to file pretrial motions pursuant to the progression order. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between May 9, 2008 and June 2, 2008, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Snake

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
May 9, 2008
8:08CR94 (D. Neb. May. 9, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Snake

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD ANTHONY SNAKE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: May 9, 2008

Citations

8:08CR94 (D. Neb. May. 9, 2008)