From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Smith

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Nov 6, 2007
4:07CR3074 (D. Neb. Nov. 6, 2007)

Opinion

4:07CR3074.

November 6, 2007


ORDER


IT IS ORDERED,

The joint oral motion of counsel is granted and,

The change of plea is continued to November 27, 2007 at 1:30 p.m.

The ends of justice will be served by granting such a motion, and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and the additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, the time between today's date and the anticipated plea of guilty, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, for the reason that defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, the novelty and complexity of the case, and the fact that the failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).

The defendant shall be present at the hearing.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Smith

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Nov 6, 2007
4:07CR3074 (D. Neb. Nov. 6, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM CONRAD SMITH, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Nov 6, 2007

Citations

4:07CR3074 (D. Neb. Nov. 6, 2007)