From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Feb 11, 2011
414 F. App'x 247 (11th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-13368 Non-Argument Calendar.

February 11, 2011.

Tracia M. King, Matthew Turner Jackson, Lawrence R. Sommerfeld, Sally Yates, U.S. Attorney's Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael J. Trost, Attorney at Law, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00079-JEC-GGB-1.

Before BLACK, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.


Michael Trost, appointed counsel for Phillip Smith, in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because counsel believes that the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smith's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Feb 11, 2011
414 F. App'x 247 (11th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip SMITH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Feb 11, 2011

Citations

414 F. App'x 247 (11th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Meeks

The Court has reviewed those courts' dockets, and that appears to be the case. See United States v. Smith,…