From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Samarah

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 22, 2007
246 F. App'x 448 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-50306.

Submitted August 13, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed August 22, 2007.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., Peter A. Frandsen, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff.

Ronald L. Gruzen, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Intervenor-Appellee.

Husam Samarah, Butner, NC, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-01-00870-R.

Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Husam Samarah appeals pro se from the district court's order for immediate payment of funds to Bank of America ("Bank"), one of the victims of Samarah's bank fraud offense. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Samarah challenges the Bank's participation in obtaining the district court's order for payment of proceeds to the Bank from a property sale, to be credited towards the amount of restitution ordered when Samarah was convicted of bank fraud. We are unpersuaded, because the proceedings to obtain this payment were conducted in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3664.

We deny Samarah's motion for extension of time to file a reply brief.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Samarah

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 22, 2007
246 F. App'x 448 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Samarah

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Bank of America, NA (U.S.A.)…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 22, 2007

Citations

246 F. App'x 448 (9th Cir. 2007)