From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Rubashkin

United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Eastern Division
Nov 19, 2009
No. 08-CR-1324-LRR (N.D. Iowa Nov. 19, 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-CR-1324-LRR.

November 19, 2009


ORDER


The matter before the court is the government's "Motion for Leave to Dismiss Without Prejudice" ("Motion") (docket no. 745). In the Motion, the government asks for leave to dismiss Counts 1-72 and the Forfeiture Allegation in the Seventh Superseding Indictment (docket no. 544) against Defendants Sholom Rubashkin and Agriprocessors, Inc. Defendants Rubashkin and Agriprocessors, Inc. do not resist the Motion.

For the reasons stated in the Motion, the Motion is GRANTED. Counts 1-72 of the Seventh Superseding Indictment against Defendants Rubashkin and Agriprocessors, Inc., as well as the forfeiture allegation, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The charges in the Seventh Superseding Indictment against Defendant Brent Beebe are not affected by the instant Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Rubashkin

United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Eastern Division
Nov 19, 2009
No. 08-CR-1324-LRR (N.D. Iowa Nov. 19, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Rubashkin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SHOLOM RUBASHKIN, BRENT BEEBE and…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Eastern Division

Date published: Nov 19, 2009

Citations

No. 08-CR-1324-LRR (N.D. Iowa Nov. 19, 2009)