From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Romero

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Apr 2, 2007
CASE NO. 8:06CR350 (D. Neb. Apr. 2, 2007)

Opinion

8:06CR350.

April 2, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the court on defendant's motion to continue the trial currently set for April 3, 2007. For good cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion [16] is granted, as follows:

1. The above-entitled case is scheduled for a jury trial before the Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, District Court Judge, to begin Tuesday, June 12, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 2, Third Floor, Roman L. Hruska United States Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska; because this is a criminal case, defendant(s) must be present in person. Counsel will receive more specific information regarding the order of trial from Judge Smith Camp's staff.

3. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(A), I find that the ends of justice will be served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between April 3, 2007 and June 12, 2007, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 because counsel require more time to effectively prepare the case, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Romero

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Apr 2, 2007
CASE NO. 8:06CR350 (D. Neb. Apr. 2, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Romero

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ADRIAN ROMERO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Apr 2, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 8:06CR350 (D. Neb. Apr. 2, 2007)