From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jun 10, 2008
4:08CR3024 (D. Neb. Jun. 10, 2008)

Opinion

4:08CR3024.

June 10, 2008


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before me on a report and recommendation by Magistrate Judge Piester, recommending that the defendants' motions to suppress be granted. No statement of objections has been filed pursuant to NECrimR 57.3 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

I have conducted a de novo review of the record and for the most part the report and recommendation will be adopted. I need not decide, however, whether reasonable suspicion justified the defendants' detention following the stop because Judge Piester was correct in concluding that the officer lacked probable cause to search the vehicle even if the detention was lawful. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (filing 41) is adopted to the extent described above; and
2. the defendants' motions to suppress (filings 24, 27) are granted.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jun 10, 2008
4:08CR3024 (D. Neb. Jun. 10, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HECTOR RODRIGUEZ, JR. and LUIS…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Jun 10, 2008

Citations

4:08CR3024 (D. Neb. Jun. 10, 2008)