From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Robinson

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Oct 5, 2010
Criminal No. 10-110(2) (RHK/JJK) (D. Minn. Oct. 5, 2010)

Opinion

Criminal No. 10-110(2) (RHK/JJK).

October 5, 2010


ORDER


The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated September 15, 2010. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following Order.

IT IS HERERBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 84) is ADOPTED;

2. Defendant's Pretrial Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions and Answers (Doc. No. 33) is DENIED; and

3. Defendant's Pretrial Motion for Disclosure and Suppression of Evidence Derived from Wiretaps (Doc. No. 38) is DENIED.

Dated: October 5, 2010


Summaries of

U.S. v. Robinson

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Oct 5, 2010
Criminal No. 10-110(2) (RHK/JJK) (D. Minn. Oct. 5, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Lashun Danario Robinson, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Oct 5, 2010

Citations

Criminal No. 10-110(2) (RHK/JJK) (D. Minn. Oct. 5, 2010)