Opinion
CASE NO. 8:06CR125.
March 27, 2007
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Defendant's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Filing No. 61) and a supporting affidavit (Filing No. 62).
The Defendant previously qualified for appointed counsel. The Court concludes that the Defendant has satisfied the requirements of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(1).
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Defendant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Filing No. 61) is granted; and
2. The Defendant may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.