holding that a forfeiture notice sent to prison where the prisoner-owner was incarcerated was constitutionally adequate, regardless of whether the prisoner actually received the notice
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Dusenbery96-3757.
October 31, 1997.
Appeal from N.D.Ohio.
Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.
holding that a forfeiture notice sent to prison where the prisoner-owner was incarcerated was constitutionally adequate, regardless of whether the prisoner actually received the notice
Summary of this case from U.S. v. DusenberyFull title:U.S. v. Real Property
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: Oct 31, 1997
United States v. Ray, 114 F.3d 1190, 1997 WL 259361, at *1 (6th Cir. 1997) (quoting Giraldo, 45 F.3d at 511;…
U.S v. DusenberyMullane, 339 U.S. at 314. As the district court correctly stated, citing United States v. Real Property, Tree…