From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Randle

United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Southern Division
Sep 13, 2007
CR 06-40070 (D.S.D. Sep. 13, 2007)

Opinion

CR 06-40070.

September 13, 2007


ORDER


The Defendant has requested an amendment to his Judgment which would allow him to be employed during his custody at the Glory House in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. (Doc. 41.) After the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") refused to authorize employment, Defendant's lawyer contacted the BOP and was informed that Defendant would be allowed to work if the Judgment included language granting work release. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure,

IT IS ORDERED that the imprisonment section on page 2 of the Judgment shall be amended to read as follows:

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term of: six (6) months at the Glory House with work release authorized.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Randle

United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Southern Division
Sep 13, 2007
CR 06-40070 (D.S.D. Sep. 13, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Randle

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GERALD GARMAIN RANDLE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 13, 2007

Citations

CR 06-40070 (D.S.D. Sep. 13, 2007)