From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Ramirez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 13, 2009
349 F. App'x 141 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-50569.

Submitted September 14, 2009.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed October 13, 2009.

Bruce R. Castetter, Assistant U.S., Joseph S. Green, Assistant U.S., Peter Ko, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert E. Boyce, Esquire, Attorney at Law, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 3:06-CR-00590-H-4.

Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Armando Ramirez appeals from the 235-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ramirez contends the district court erred by denying a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. We conclude the district court did not clearly err in denying the adjustment. See United States v. Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1282-83 (9th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Ramirez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 13, 2009
349 F. App'x 141 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Armando RAMIREZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 13, 2009

Citations

349 F. App'x 141 (9th Cir. 2009)