From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Prokupek

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Dec 8, 2008
8:08CR183 (D. Neb. Dec. 8, 2008)

Opinion

8:08CR183.

December 8, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the motion of defendant, Ronald Prokupek, to reprogress the case (Doc. 46). Mr. Prokupek's pretrial motion deadline expired May 27, 2008, and he made no request of record that his deadline be tolled while co-defendant McGlothlen's pretrial motions were pending. In the interests of justice, however,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. 46) is granted, as follows:

1. The deadline for filing pretrial motions is extended to January 5, 2009, as to both defendants, and the jury trial now set for December 23, 2008 is cancelled, as to both defendants.

2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between December 2, 2008 and January 5, 2009, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act because counsel require additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B)(iv).

3. Defendant Prokupek shall file an affidavit or declaration regarding speedy trial, as required by NECrimR 12.1 and/or 12.3, as soon as is practicable.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Prokupek

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Dec 8, 2008
8:08CR183 (D. Neb. Dec. 8, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Prokupek

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RONALD PROKUPEK and CHRISTINE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Dec 8, 2008

Citations

8:08CR183 (D. Neb. Dec. 8, 2008)