From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Prentice

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 4, 2010
Criminal No. 09-343(1) (DWF/RLE) (D. Minn. Feb. 4, 2010)

Opinion

Criminal No. 09-343(1) (DWF/RLE).

February 4, 2010

Clifford B. Wardlaw, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, counsel for Plaintiff.

Aaron J. Morrison, Esq., Peter B. Wold, PA, counsel for Defendant.


ORDER


Based upon the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-entitled matter,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. That the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Confessions or Statements in the Nature of Confessions (Doc. No. [11]) is DENIED.

2. That the Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. No. [18]) is DENIED.

3. That the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Indictment on the Grounds that the Court does not Have Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. No. [19]) is DENIED.

4. That the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Indictment on duplicity grounds (Doc. No. [22]) is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Prentice

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 4, 2010
Criminal No. 09-343(1) (DWF/RLE) (D. Minn. Feb. 4, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Prentice

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Charles William Prentice, Jr.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Feb 4, 2010

Citations

Criminal No. 09-343(1) (DWF/RLE) (D. Minn. Feb. 4, 2010)