From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Polk

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Oct 24, 2007
8:07CR304 (D. Neb. Oct. 24, 2007)

Opinion

8:07CR304.

October 24, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Donald Laushman (Laushman) (Filing No. 29). Laushman seeks a continuance of the trial of this matter which is scheduled for November 6, 2007. Laushman's counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection to the motion. Laushman's counsel represents that Laushman consents to the motion and will file an affidavit wherein Laushman acknowledges and understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted and trial will be continued as to both defendants.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Laushman's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 29) is granted.

2. Trial of this matter is re-scheduled for December 18, 2007, before Judge Laurie Smith Camp and a jury. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between October 24, 2007 and December 18, 2007, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason that defendants' counsel require additional time to adequately prepare the case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Polk

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Oct 24, 2007
8:07CR304 (D. Neb. Oct. 24, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Polk

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KEITH POLK and DONALD LAUSHMAN…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Oct 24, 2007

Citations

8:07CR304 (D. Neb. Oct. 24, 2007)