From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Polk

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Sep 21, 2007
8:07CR304 (D. Neb. Sep. 21, 2007)

Opinion

8:07CR304.

September 21, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the motion for an extension of time by defendant Keith Polk (Polk) (Filing No. 20). Polk seeks an additional two weeks in which to file pretrial motions in accordance with the progression order (Filing No. 9). Polk has filed an affidavit wherein he consents to the motion and acknowledges he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted

IT IS ORDERED:

Defendant Polk's motion for an extension of time (Filing No. 20) is granted. Polk is given until on or before October 9, 2007, in which to file pretrial motions pursuant to the progression order. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between September 21, 2007 and October 9, 2007, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Polk

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Sep 21, 2007
8:07CR304 (D. Neb. Sep. 21, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Polk

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KEITH POLK and, DONALD LAUSCHMAN…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Sep 21, 2007

Citations

8:07CR304 (D. Neb. Sep. 21, 2007)