From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Payton

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 23, 2011
430 F. App'x 229 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-7735.

Submitted: May 19, 2011.

Decided: May 23, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:06-cr-00341-PJM-1; 8:10-cv-01558-PJM).

William Tyrone Payton, Appellant Pro Se. David Ira Salem, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


William Tyrone Payton seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion and has moved for a certificate of appealability. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Payton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Payton

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 23, 2011
430 F. App'x 229 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Payton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Tyrone PAYTON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 23, 2011

Citations

430 F. App'x 229 (4th Cir. 2011)