From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Panhandle Eastern Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 14, 1989
868 F.2d 1363 (3d Cir. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-3668.

Argued January 31, 1989.

Decided March 14, 1989. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied April 7, 1989.

Michael Joseph (argued), Dyer, Ellis, Joseph Mills, Washington, D.C., for appellants.

Gregory A. Harrison (argued), U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Div., Commercial Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Richard T. Franch (argued), Jenner and Block, Chicago, Ill., for appellee General Dynamics Corp.

Michael J. Hurley (argued), Howrey Simon, Washington, D.C., for appellees Moore McCormack Resources, Inc. and Moore McCormack LNG Transport, Inc.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (D.C. Civil Action No. 87-00190).

Before HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT


This is an appeal from a final order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granting appellee's motion for summary judgment with respect to some of its claims. Since the order granting summary judgment, if affirmed, wholly disposes of the case and the district court has certified it for appeal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291 (West Supp. 1988). On the merits, the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware is affirmed on the opinion of Judge James L. Latchum, reported at 693 F. Supp. 88 (D.Del. 1988).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Panhandle Eastern Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 14, 1989
868 F.2d 1363 (3d Cir. 1989)
Case details for

U.S. v. Panhandle Eastern Corp.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PANHANDLE EASTERN CORP., PANHANDLE EASTERN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Mar 14, 1989

Citations

868 F.2d 1363 (3d Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

Rodrock v. Moury

Although the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has not explicitly ruled on this issue,…