From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. OTT

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 30, 2010
Crim. No. 10-165(3) (DSD/JJK) (D. Minn. Sep. 30, 2010)

Opinion

Crim. No. 10-165(3) (DSD/JJK).

September 30, 2010


Order


The above matter comes before the court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated September 10, 2010. No objections have been filed by defendant Stacie Marie Ott to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the court now makes and enters the following Order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Stacie Marie Ott's Motion to Sever Defendant (Doc. No. 85), is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

2. Defendant Stacie Marie Ott's Motion for Disclosure of Co-Defendants' Statements (Doc. No. 77), is DENIED.

Date: September 30, 2010


Summaries of

U.S. v. OTT

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 30, 2010
Crim. No. 10-165(3) (DSD/JJK) (D. Minn. Sep. 30, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. OTT

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Stacie Marie Ott, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Sep 30, 2010

Citations

Crim. No. 10-165(3) (DSD/JJK) (D. Minn. Sep. 30, 2010)