From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Osuji

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
May 12, 2009
CRIMINAL NO. 3:06CR415 (W.D.N.C. May. 12, 2009)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 3:06CR415.

May 12, 2009


ORDER


THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's pro se motion to amend the record. Motion to Amend the Record, filed May 4, 2009.

The Defendant has been advised repeatedly to file motions only through counsel. United States v. D'Amario, 2008 WL 624768 at *1, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 5079 at *4 (3d Cir. 2008) (holding that district courts are not obligated to consider pro se motions from a defendant who is represented by counsel because "[t]he Constitution does not confer a right to proceed simultaneously by counsel and pro se"); see also, Order, filed May 20, 2008, at 1-2; Order, filed January 6, 2009, at 1-2. Again, the Defendant is instructed to communicate with the Court only through his attorney. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant's pro se motion to amend the record is hereby DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Osuji

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
May 12, 2009
CRIMINAL NO. 3:06CR415 (W.D.N.C. May. 12, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Osuji

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAUL OSUJI

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: May 12, 2009

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 3:06CR415 (W.D.N.C. May. 12, 2009)