From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Ortega

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jul 30, 2009
CR 09-0535-TUC-CKJ (D. Ariz. Jul. 30, 2009)

Opinion

CR 09-0535-TUC-CKJ.

July 30, 2009


ORDER


On June 29, 2009, Magistrate Judge Charles R. Pyle issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. #81] in which he recommended that Defendant Garrett's Motion to Dismiss Count 1 and Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. #43] be denied. Magistrate Judge Pyle also recommended that Defendant Garrett's Motion to Sever [Doc. #44] be dismissed without prejudice, and her Motion for a James Hearing [Doc. #45] be denied. No objections have been filed within the time provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

Accordingly, after an independent review, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. #81] is ADOPTED;

2. Defendant Garrett's Motion to Dismiss Count 1 and Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. #43] is DENIED;

3. Defendant Garrett's Motion to Sever [Doc. #44] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

4. Defendant Garrett's Motion for a James Hearing [Doc. #45] is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Ortega

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jul 30, 2009
CR 09-0535-TUC-CKJ (D. Ariz. Jul. 30, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Ortega

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARIO ORTEGA, JR., DIANE DOLORES…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jul 30, 2009

Citations

CR 09-0535-TUC-CKJ (D. Ariz. Jul. 30, 2009)