From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Omian

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 7, 2006
Case No. 05-80338 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 7, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 05-80338.

November 7, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [D/E # 111], GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY [D/E # 88]


The Court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed October 11, 2006, as well as the parties' briefs, and having received no objections from either side,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report is accepted and entered as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

As a result, the Defendant's Motion for Return of Property is GRANTED. If the Government has not yet turned over the third party travel documents as identified in the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, the Government must do so immediately. In addition, the Government must also immediately turn over the documents pertaining to property at 2744-2746 Salina and 2781 Akron.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Omian

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 7, 2006
Case No. 05-80338 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 7, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Omian

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. MONASSER MOSAD OMIAN, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 7, 2006

Citations

Case No. 05-80338 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 7, 2006)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Ivaskevich

Rule 41(g) is grounded in principles of equity. See U.S. v. Omian, No. 05-80338, 2006 WL 3240555, *2…

United States v. Decker

United States v. Headley, 50 F. App'x. 266, 267 (6th Cir. 2002). If the movant establishes interest in the…