From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Noble

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Aug 4, 2008
4:08CR3022 (D. Neb. Aug. 4, 2008)

Opinion

4:08CR3022.

August 4, 2008


ORDER


IT IS ORDERED,

The oral motion of counsel for defendant is granted and,

The change of plea is continued to August 12, 2008 at 2:30 p.m.

The ends of justice will be served by granting such a motion, and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and the additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, the time between today's date and the anticipated plea of guilty, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, for the reason that defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, the novelty and complexity of the case, and the fact that the failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).

The defendant shall be present at the hearing.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Noble

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Aug 4, 2008
4:08CR3022 (D. Neb. Aug. 4, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Noble

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ZACHARY NOBLE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Aug 4, 2008

Citations

4:08CR3022 (D. Neb. Aug. 4, 2008)