Opinion
Criminal File No. 06-00099 (MJD).
July 25, 2010
James E. Lackner, Assistant United States Attorney, Counsel for Plaintiff.
Joseph E. Navin, pro se.
ORDER
In an Order dated May 21, 2010 [Docket No. 7], the Court denied Defendant Joseph E. Navin's pro se Motion for Reduction or Reversal of Federal Fine [Docket No. 5] for lack of jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3573. Nevertheless, the Court construed Defendant's motion to also request an adjustment to his payment schedule under 18 U.S.C. § 3572(d)(3). The Court granted Defendant until June 4, 2010 to file a brief explaining how he has suffered a material change in economic circumstances that might affect his ability to pay the fine.
Because Defendant has failed to file any submissions pursuant to the Court's Order, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's pro se Motion for Reduction or Reversal of Federal Fine, construed to be a Motion for Adjustment to the Payment Schedule of his Federal Fine, [Docket No. 5] is DENIED.