From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Munoz-Guerrero

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 2, 2007
226 F. App'x 420 (5th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-40284 Conference Calendar.

May 2, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender's Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, USDC No. 5:05-CR-1799-ALL.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.


Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Marcelo Munoz-Guerrero raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Munoz-Guerrero

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 2, 2007
226 F. App'x 420 (5th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Munoz-Guerrero

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcelo MUNOZ-GUERRERO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 2, 2007

Citations

226 F. App'x 420 (5th Cir. 2007)