Based on the clear, unambiguous and credible testimony of Hardin establishing that Defendant was advised of his Miranda rights, as well as the written Miranda waiver, and the lack of any evidence from Defendant directly challenging Hardin's testimony, the Court finds that Defendant was advised of his Miranda rights. See United States v. Morel, No. 09-CR-493, 2010 WL 2545479, at *7-8 (E.D.N.Y. June 18, 2010) (finding that defendant was properly advised of his Miranda rights where law enforcement agents credibly testified that he was read his Miranda rights and noting the defendant's "initial hesitant assertion in his affidavit that he merely 'd[id] not recall' being advised of his rights."). ii. Defendant knowingly waived his Miranda rights