From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. McGhee

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Sep 19, 1996
95 F.3d 1335 (6th Cir. 1996)

Summary

vacating decision holding that the trial court's failure to submit question of materiality to jury was not plain error

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Tandon

Opinion

No. 95-6323

September 19, 1996.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KENNEDY, MARTIN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE and COLE, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and the case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is further ORDERED that the appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, October 21, 1996, and the appellee file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, December 23, 1996. Reargument will be scheduled for Wednesday, March 12, 1997.


Summaries of

U.S. v. McGhee

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Sep 19, 1996
95 F.3d 1335 (6th Cir. 1996)

vacating decision holding that the trial court's failure to submit question of materiality to jury was not plain error

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Tandon
Case details for

U.S. v. McGhee

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HAROLD LEON MCGHEE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Sep 19, 1996

Citations

95 F.3d 1335 (6th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Tandon

The grant of certiorari also has a direct effect on this court's consideration of United States v. McGhee, 87…