U.S. v. Marcos-Quiroga

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO MARCOS-QUIROGA, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division

Date published: Jul 23, 2007

No. CR 06-3009-MWB (N.D. Iowa Jul. 23, 2007)

Opinion

No. CR 06-3009-MWB.

July 23, 2007

ORDER REGARDING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA

MARK BENNETT, Chief Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

In an Indictment handed down March 22, 2006, defendant Francisco Marcos-Quiroga was charged with possessing, with intent to distribute, 5 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine within 1,000 feet of a playground after having previously been convicted of a felony drug-trafficking offense. On July 6, 2007, defendant appeared before Chief United States Magistrate Judge Paul A. Zoss and entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the indictment. On this same date, Judge Zoss filed a Report and Recommendation in which he recommends that defendant's guilty plea be accepted. No objections to Judge Zoss's Report and Recommendation were filed. The court, therefore, undertakes the necessary review of Judge Zoss's recommendation to accept defendant's plea in this case.

II. ANALYSIS

Pursuant to statute, this court's standard of review for a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is as follows:

A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate [judge].

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Similarly, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) provides for review of a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation on dispositive motions and prisoner petitions, where objections are made, as follows:

The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the magistrate judge's disposition to which specific written objection has been made in accordance with this rule. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended decision, receive further evidence, or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.

FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).

In this case, no objections have been filed, and it appears to the court upon review of Judge Zoss's findings and conclusions, that there is no ground to reject or modify them. Therefore, the court accepts Judge Zoss's Report and Recommendation of July 6, 2007, and accepts defendant's plea of guilty in this case to Count 1 of the indictment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.