From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mah

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 23, 2011
439 F. App'x 653 (9th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-50568.

Submitted June 15, 2011.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

June 23, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding D.C. No. 3:09-cr-01564-BEN.

Before: CANBY, O'SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Kenneth Poon Mah appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for manufacturing marijuana and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.

Mah contends that the district court erred in determining that he was ineligible for safety-valve relief under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2, because it applied a clearly improbable burden of proof. We agree. See United States v. Ferryman, 444 F.3d 1183, 1186 (9th Cir. 2006) (the burden is on the defendant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he qualifies for safety valve relief).

The case is remanded for the district court to determine whether Mah can prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he qualifies for safety-valve relief. See United States v. Nelson, 222 F.3d 545, 550-51 (9th Cir. 2000).

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Mah

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 23, 2011
439 F. App'x 653 (9th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Mah

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENNETH POON MAH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 23, 2011

Citations

439 F. App'x 653 (9th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

United States v. Tanner

526 F.3d at 1252 (quoting Ferryman , 444 F.3d at 1186 ). This error has not been replicated in subsequent…

United States v. Tanner

526 F.3d at 1252 (quoting Ferryman, 444 F.3d at 1186). This error has not been replicated in subsequent Ninth…