From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Lytle

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Nov 26, 2007
CASE NO. 8:07CR262 (D. Neb. Nov. 26, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 8:07CR262.

November 26, 2007


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Filing No. 22) issued by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken recommending denial of the Defendant's motion to suppress (Filing No. 11). No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation as allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and NECrimR 57.3(a).

The Defendant, Clifton Lytle, Jr., seeks an order suppressing evidence obtained as a result of the April 8, 2007, stop of a vehicle driven by the Defendant. Lytle argues that probable cause did not support his arrest for reckless driving.

Judge Thalken noted the following with respect to Lytle's driving: his speed; Lytle's failure to stop once officers' lights were activated; Lytle stopped only after officers used a spotlight and siren; Lytle stopped in a traffic lane as opposed to the shoulder of the road; signs of alcohol impairment were present, although Lytle was still within the legal limit; and Lytle's blood alcohol content measured .055, 70% of the driving under the influence limit of .08. Judge Thalken also noted that reckless driving is an offense for which one may be arrested. Judge Thalken concluded: probable cause existed to arrest Lytle for reckless driving on April 8, 2007; and the search of the vehicle driven by Lytle occurred after a valid traffic stop and reasonable detention.

Notwithstanding the absence of objections, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and NECrimR 57.3, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. The Court has read the parties' briefs (Filing Nos. 12, 14) and the transcript (Filing No. 20). The Court has also viewed the evidence. (Filing No. 17) Because Judge Thalken fully, carefully, and correctly applied the law to the facts, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Filing No. 22) is adopted in its entirety; and
2. The Defendant's motion to suppress (Filing No. 11) is denied.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Lytle

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Nov 26, 2007
CASE NO. 8:07CR262 (D. Neb. Nov. 26, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Lytle

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CLIFTON LYTLE, JR., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Nov 26, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 8:07CR262 (D. Neb. Nov. 26, 2007)