Opinion
No. 07-10021.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed June 15, 2007.
Darren W.K. Ching, USH — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Shanlyn A.S. Park, FPDHI — Federal Public Defender's Office, Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, David A. Ezra, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-00-00164-DAE.
Before: LEAVY, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Ernesto Castillo Lopez, Jr. appeals from the district court's revocation of supervised release.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Castillo Lopez's counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Castillo Lopez has not filed a pro se brief, and the Government has not filed an answering brief.
Our independent review of the briefs and the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.