From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Lopez

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jun 29, 2010
Criminal No. 10-88(1) (DWF/FLN) (D. Minn. Jun. 29, 2010)

Opinion

Criminal No. 10-88(1) (DWF/FLN).

June 29, 2010

Jeffrey M. Bryan, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, counsel for Plaintiff.

Craig E. Cascarano, Essq., Cascarano Law Office, counsel for Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated June 11, 2010, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion to suppress confessions, admissions or statements made in the nature of confessions (Doc. No. [68]) is DENIED AS MOOT;

2. Defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained through illegal search (Doc. No. [70] is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Lopez

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jun 29, 2010
Criminal No. 10-88(1) (DWF/FLN) (D. Minn. Jun. 29, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Arturo Lopez, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jun 29, 2010

Citations

Criminal No. 10-88(1) (DWF/FLN) (D. Minn. Jun. 29, 2010)