U.S. v. Loomis

1 Citing case

  1. United States v. Woodard

    694 F.3d 950 (8th Cir. 2012)   Cited 13 times
    Affirming enhancement based on conduct occurring 19 years earlier because “ § 2G2.2(b) contains no temporal limitation”

    Applying the same analysis here, we hold that a juvenile adjudication may be considered a prior conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2252(b). We note that our holding is consistent with the Eleventh Circuit's unpublished opinion in United States v. Loomis, 230 Fed.Appx. 938, 939 (11th Cir.2007) (per curiam), in which the Eleventh Circuit found no plain error in the district court's determination that the defendant's youthful offender adjudication was a prior conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2252(b). B.