From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Lawson

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Sep 4, 2008
8:08CR17 (D. Neb. Sep. 4, 2008)

Opinion

8:08CR17.

September 4, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the government's motion to continue trial (Doc. 38). For good cause shown, and upon the representation that defense counsel does not object, the court finds that the motion should be granted.

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is granted, as follows:

1. The jury trial now set for September 23, 2008, is continued to Tuesday, October 7, 2008.

2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between September 23, 2008 and October 7, 2008, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act due to counsel's scheduling conflict. Counsel require additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B)(iv).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Lawson

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Sep 4, 2008
8:08CR17 (D. Neb. Sep. 4, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Lawson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARCUS D. LAWSON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Sep 4, 2008

Citations

8:08CR17 (D. Neb. Sep. 4, 2008)