From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Lariscy

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division
May 5, 2008
607CR010 (S.D. Ga. May. 5, 2008)

Opinion

607CR010.

May 5, 2008


ORDER


The Government's motion in limine (doc. # 32) is GRANTED. Jury nullification arguments are not permitted in the Eleventh Circuit. See U.S. v. Trujillo, 714 F.2d 102, 106 (11th Cir. 1983) ("[D]efense counsel may not argue jury nullification during closing argument"); U.S. v. Roberts, 215 Fed.Appx. 842, 847 (11th Cir. 2007) ("We do not permit defense counsel to make a nullification argument to the jury. . . ."). Also, neither the issue of punishment nor the "fairness" of the firearm statutes in question is appropriate in any argument before the jury.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Lariscy

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division
May 5, 2008
607CR010 (S.D. Ga. May. 5, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Lariscy

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. TONY LAVAUGHN LARISCY

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division

Date published: May 5, 2008

Citations

607CR010 (S.D. Ga. May. 5, 2008)